With Capture One, you have catalogs and sessions. I would not suggest using this software to store many jobs or to organize your files. Of course, you have the capability to create multiple projects (individual catalogs). The biggest difference is with DxO, the files don’t have to process through importing they seem to point directly to the folder with the RAW files without having to build a running catalog. (A great tip for wedding workflow is to use a culling software first, then import the desired images into a processing program.)ĭxO handles hundreds of images as well as Lightroom does. Capture One is the slowest of the three having to go through thousands of images to edit it was a nightmare. This brings up a great question in regards to workflow and handling a lot of images at once. Having been a Lightroom user, I will say that the Capture One and DxO interfaces are a lot different, and that is normal with any software change. Noise levels on the images are higher, which might cause the sharper effect in comparison to the Capture One image. In the Lightroom and DxO renderings, it’s the details in the hair that sets them apart. However, the strands of hair get a little smoothed over. Noise levels are low since the image was a stop underexposed and shot at ISO 400. The edge detail looks really good in the Capture One image. For single-image rendering, I suggest using Capture One for the quality.īefore making comparisons, I made sure to turn off the Detail enhancements on all three images. Compared to Capture One, you are getting a good enough rendering of the RAW file. I understand that the capabilities of the DxO software at an automation level are fantastic, but at a simple RAW conversion level, it falls short. I have to raise the exposure past two stops to relieve the black clipping. Contrast seems to be heavier, especially with the crushed black point. Shadow detail is smooth from capture, without adding any recovering effects into the equation.ĭxO and Lightroom do a good job with the color, but they lack the dynamic range of the Capture One file. Compared to the others, the dynamic range is slightly wider. Saturation isn’t too high, and the gradients across the ivy backdrop are rendered well. Greens and blues in this image are quiet nice overall. The rendering of the Capture One version has a nice range of color and tonality. I did my best to match these images between programs. No other settings are taking effect other than the ICC profile generated from the camera’s manufacturer. White balance is as-shot throughout all of these images and set to be neutral in the overcast lighting. Noise reduction and shadow recovery will be interesting with this image. My first task is to increase the exposure a little more than a stop in order to compensate for my underexposed image. What I am bringing to the table is a quality versus quantity comparison of Capture One Pro 8, DxO Optics Pro 10 and Lightroom CC.Īfter importing the image into each program and selecting a file, I am ready to compare. I am looking for a total workflow solution for the possibility of hundreds of RAW files in a nondestructive program. I shoot with a Nikon d750, and the typical software used with it is Capture NX-D. In this article, I dig into RAW processing specifically, not just converting RAW files. If you aren’t familiar with these RAW processing programs, you can download free trials of both. But there are other options out there, like DxO Optics Pro 10 and Capture One Pro 8. Can’t say I disagree with using Adobe Lightroom-it’s our bread and butter. I speak with studios on a daily basis that are stuck in Adobe Camera Raw, Adobe Lightroom, etc., and they don’t want to budge. Working with Evolve Edits forces me to constantly research options for wedding workflows and post-production. You have to be ready for change, embrace it. “Adapt or die” is the motto we use at SCP when you are staring into the abyss. Who hasn’t had the kind of experience where you’re ready to convert and process files, and you find out Adobe just launched a new version of Photoshop? Photographers work in an industry where technology and software are evolving so rapidly it’s hard to keep up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |